Brilliant convo from some of the wise men of this realm. A bit waffling at the start then deep questions and answers. An achievement in these times. Somehow I get every point.
You/we say the solution is found in evolving the state of consciousness we are in. Yes, good. Then suggest that follower consciousness is an enduring issue. I listened a bit more and will continue to look for your expressions of 'solutions', but expect the 'how' part the let me down yet again. I don't get it. Brendan and Evan are more detailed and able to express many subtitles that I find difficult to approach, yet as with many other consciousness interested folk, verbiage flows toward the old story rather than toward creating a new story. My two cents, we are stuck in the rut made by declaring the spiritual and the physical are fundamentally different . What if they are fundamentally similar? Add to that; 'spirituality is the useful and/or responsible application of free will'. Then we have a way to tie the subtle and the gross elements together and begin to recognize our creative power, our role and a road toward sovereignty based on confidence created by practice in decision making guided by natural law. This current split model gives power to extremists while a continuum model may give power to the individual. Thank you for any consideration.
I do not actually hold that dualistic worldview, as you interpret. My first book (over 600 pages; year 2012) fundamentally destroys the perceived dualism between "matter" and "energy"/non-physicality/spirit. It is the "continuum model" you apparently yearned for in this conversation but felt you didn't get. I invite you to read it if you've not yet: www.brendanDmurphy.com/tgi
The whole point of that book was to create that "new story." It ended up receiving some pretty high praise too.
As with any interview, I work with the context, questions and comments given me, and I felt like Evan was solid, as always. There were directions I would have liked to move in or themes I could have elaborated on in more detail but the conversation moved on before I could; I generally go with the flow. Maybe a different framing of the discussion in future might yield something closer to what you're looking for. Tell me what questions/talking points you would have used as prompts if you were Evan.
I also realise: to me, because I'm so accustomed to *not* operating within that duality you mention, I generally forget to identify it and spell it out for people (I've moved on). To me, it is all the One field of reference (technically) and I don't disagree with your comment, "spirituality is the useful and/or responsible application of free will."
Brilliant convo from some of the wise men of this realm. A bit waffling at the start then deep questions and answers. An achievement in these times. Somehow I get every point.
Appreciate your thoughtful feedback! Cheers
its cute that u attempt to take on such subject matter as a useless retard with no skills nor personality 🤭
You/we say the solution is found in evolving the state of consciousness we are in. Yes, good. Then suggest that follower consciousness is an enduring issue. I listened a bit more and will continue to look for your expressions of 'solutions', but expect the 'how' part the let me down yet again. I don't get it. Brendan and Evan are more detailed and able to express many subtitles that I find difficult to approach, yet as with many other consciousness interested folk, verbiage flows toward the old story rather than toward creating a new story. My two cents, we are stuck in the rut made by declaring the spiritual and the physical are fundamentally different . What if they are fundamentally similar? Add to that; 'spirituality is the useful and/or responsible application of free will'. Then we have a way to tie the subtle and the gross elements together and begin to recognize our creative power, our role and a road toward sovereignty based on confidence created by practice in decision making guided by natural law. This current split model gives power to extremists while a continuum model may give power to the individual. Thank you for any consideration.
I do not actually hold that dualistic worldview, as you interpret. My first book (over 600 pages; year 2012) fundamentally destroys the perceived dualism between "matter" and "energy"/non-physicality/spirit. It is the "continuum model" you apparently yearned for in this conversation but felt you didn't get. I invite you to read it if you've not yet: www.brendanDmurphy.com/tgi
The whole point of that book was to create that "new story." It ended up receiving some pretty high praise too.
As with any interview, I work with the context, questions and comments given me, and I felt like Evan was solid, as always. There were directions I would have liked to move in or themes I could have elaborated on in more detail but the conversation moved on before I could; I generally go with the flow. Maybe a different framing of the discussion in future might yield something closer to what you're looking for. Tell me what questions/talking points you would have used as prompts if you were Evan.
I also realise: to me, because I'm so accustomed to *not* operating within that duality you mention, I generally forget to identify it and spell it out for people (I've moved on). To me, it is all the One field of reference (technically) and I don't disagree with your comment, "spirituality is the useful and/or responsible application of free will."
Your definition is correct, IMO.
Cheers!