Died Suddenly Hits and Misses

Everyone’s talking about it - and I recently stirred the hornets’ nest by stating on Farcebook that I wasn’t going to promote it: DIED SUDDENLY

Interestingly, I noticed a number of serious researchers (including scientists) supported me in my reservations (this was before I had watched it).

One of them stated she didn’t think Peters had done a good job thus far of researching his material and she wasn’t going to pay him any more attention.

Frankly, I think a film like this will affect very few people who have not already made their minds up. For anyone even SLIGHTLY invested in the official narrative, the reality presented in the film will simply be too far beyond the pale, too outrageous (and terrifying).

In short, it’s largely an exercise in preaching to the choir. Not that more information is a bad thing, mind you, and I’m not saying don’t watch it.

Watch it if you want, it’s no skin off my back either way.

Was there any new perspective in there for me as someone who’s been actively finger-on-the-pulse for years now? No. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t view it if curious.

There was also some backlash to my post - and some petty ad hominem (and lunacy) from disappointing places.

The more civilised and sober comments got my attention though: Was I jumping to conclusions without ample justification?

As it turns out, I watched it and had to admit I underestimated Peters and co. this time around. Humble pie, anyone? 🥧

Let’s look at the film and be honest. So then…

Hits

What did the film get right?

It did a few things right, admittedly. ✅

Firstly it placed people’s attention squarely where it should be:

The clot shots (and boy does the film ever render that nickname apropos).

It made it plain as day that the real (and only) bioweapon is the convid quackseens.

That is the correct thing to focus people’s attention on, so I will give the team credit for that. The imagery of people’s unbelievable never-seen-before clots will stick with many for years. Again, not new information, but maybe it will help clarify certain things for some people… 🤷🏻‍♂️

In the end if I wanted to judge Peters’ production harshly, I only counted 3 instances where one might be able to make a complaint about insidiously (and not necessarily intentionally) reinforcing the bogus "scamdemic” narrative. I was originally anticipating this would be an issue with the film - hence my FB post (and resulting shitstorm).

Those time stamps are at roughly:

1:03 - “C***d could have caused this.” (the same gent then elucidates that he changed his mind as it became clear the shots were responsible)

30:46

43:48 - 44:30: clips about "transmission" by mainstream prostitutes

There’s really only 3 - and you COULD argue that’s being a little unkind, sure.

Why do I care about potential reinforcement of the “pandemic” narrative?

Because it’s a sham from top to bottom. The ACTUAL science we have shows that there’s clearly no such coronavirus (engineered or otherwise) - something significant portions of the ‘truth movement’ still haven’t grasped.

Sadly this confusion muddies the waters and divides us, further enabling the perpetrators of the greatest hoax in known history. If you take away the virus then everything They did in “response” to it, can be seen for the scam it is. 👌

Also, back in 2021 those of us who bothered to look could see that global mortality rates did NOT support the “pandemic” narrative. Without the 24/7 MSM brainwashing both normies and truthers alike into thinking people were suddenly dropping like flies around the world, none of this was possible.

Remember: the “psy” in “psyop” stands for PSYCHOLOGICAL.

Messing with your perception of reality is the foremost job of mainstream media.

And for the record, I’m NOT saying that some interesting and worrying things weren’t happening in certain places, but that doesn’t mean there was a “pandemic.”

Depop Juice?

Some people have criticised the film for hyping the “depopulation” theory.

But for a veteran like myself - who has been doing this type of work publicly since well before Stew Peters ever showed up - I can tell you there’s nothing outrageous about the depop idea.

I would argue that since 2021 it has NEVER been more obvious that the globalist psychopaths are hell bent on reducing the population by any means necessary.

Their own documentation and public rhetoric confirms their preoccupation with it. (No need to re-hash it here.)

The data on fetal deaths, young adults, children, and other age groups makes it irrefutable: What we are seeing is singular in history. The obvious culprit - the one major variable that shifted for many hundreds of millions of people in 2021 - is the convid shots.

After all, it wasn’t until 2021 that the health authorities felt the need to normalise 7-year-olds having heart attacks, or to gaslight us by promoting the idea that suddenly everyone’s favourite teas were causing blood clots, or, or or…. (the list goes on)

Misses

There was a lot of video footage of people falling over (a couple onto train tracks). I don’t know where it was sourced from, but I did see one observer/critic note that one of those pieces of footage predated the clot shots, and if that’s the case it should NOT have been included.

No such footage should be included if the film is to be taken seriously and also avoid freely giving ammunition to the many mainstream shills who will only too gladly point out such shortcomings and use them to dissuade people from seeing the film.

As I watched the montage of people spinning around and falling over I did wonder where it was all sourced from and how much vetting was performed…

On another tangent, one could argue they could have at least planted a seed re: the lack of any verified “coronavirus” and that it was a missed opportunity, but at the same time I can see how that would have potentially distracted some people from the primary thrust of the film.

In Sum

Again, whatever shortcomings the film may or may not have, it correctly emphasises there is indeed an agenda (which many of us have been aware of for years) and it also correctly identifies that the main weapon in this war on humanity is (currently) the cooties-19 quackseens.

It demonstrates amply that medicine has been weaponized - to horrific effect. (Not to sound like a broken record, but again, nothing new there.) It also admirably avoided falling into the “pandemic reinforcement” trap, I’m glad to say, having watched it. They simply left that stuff alone.

Will I share it to my networks and shout it from the rooftops?

No, no need to preach to the choir, and at the same time, very few non-awake people will be likely to watch it. Too confronting for most. But if it helps a handful of people connect the dots, that’s great.

Onwards and upwards!

Related Resources

For a very “alternative” (esoteric) take on what the clot shots are doing to people energetically, watch my eye-opening interview with Gerard Bini HERE

I also interviewed Dr Robert Young last year to discuss his lab analyses of the quackseens HERE

➡️ STAY TUNED because soon I’ll be presenting material from someone whose family’s work in this arena (microscopy, blood analysis, clot shots, pleomorphism, and more) you NEED TO SEE.

We will be putting some misconceptions to bed and raising some eyebrows to the ceiling. 🛏

As always, the most comprehensive and detailed information (in written, video, and audio formats) will be available inside The Truthiversity for my members

---

About Me:
Host of Truthiverse podcast. Author of the epic, “The Grand Illusion: A Synthesis of Science and Spirituality — Book 1.” Founder of The Truthiversity 📽

📲 Follow me on Telegram