A Deeper Look at Loosh Harvesting
How Monroe's Early OBE Insights Shaped the Soul Trap Cosmology
Welcome to Awakening Minds—a publication for open and discerning minds with a metaphysical leaning. To accelerate your evolution with me beyond Substack, you may want to:
Experience the “revolutionary healing science expanding the boundaries of being.” (NEXUS magazine) > Discover the life-changing EVOLVE YOURSELF biofield activations. Next ceremony: Feb 27th, CDMX
Read my first book, THE GRAND ILLUSION: A SYNTHESIS OF SCIENCE & SPIRITUALITY - Book 1 📘 10,000 hours of life-changing research—distilled
Grab a paid Substack subscription to get FULL Substack access (includes all audio 🎧 versions + commenting on all pieces)
📕 Beware: Book 2 is coming—jump on the wait list
Thanks in advance for supporting my work.
Note: What follows is not a dismissal of OBE pioneer Robert Monroe’s (valuable) work, nor an attempt to “debunk” experience itself (I value phenomenology). It is an examination of language, development, and interpretation—how early metaphors can harden into belief when removed from the context in which they arose.
Monroe’s exploration evolved over decades; the question here is not whether his experiences were “real,” but whether some of the terms used to describe them were ever meant to be taken literally in the first place.
Here we will clarify Monroe’s seminal Loosh perception in a post-belief context with greater epistemological precision than typically utilised—the result will be revealing.
“Loosh” as a Provisional Symbol
Loosh is an idea which appears in Monroe’s first book, Journeys Out of the Body (1971).
Monroe’s work is frequently cited as foundational evidence for soul-trap cosmologies, particularly his early framing of “Loosh” as an energetically valuable by-product of human emotional intensity.
This energy was supposedly valuable to “someone, somewhere”, to paraphrase Monroe’s initially vague percepts regarding an absent and unknown creator being (or so he thought at the time).
But, let’s pump the brakes for a moment and ask ourselves: what if “Loosh” was not an ontological finding? (Ontology is the study of being.) In plain terms: what if “Loosh” wasn’t something Monroe actually discovered “out there,” but simply the best word he had at the time for an experience he didn’t yet fully understand?
What if it was a linguistic prosthesis or interpretive artefact? A conceptual placeholder for a percept that had not fully clarified and stabilised in his mind in those early days?
In the early stages of his OBE reporting, Loosh allowed Monroe to:
point towards emotional intensity and value without psychologising it
acknowledge energetic interdependence (vaguely) within the Earth Life System without reductionism
talk about energy value without knowing what kind of value it had (or to whom it was valuable, and why)
However, because he named it, it felt concrete, and once named, the metaphor began to ossify/reify. As Monroe’s supporters adopted the term and translated it into ontology rather than perceptual translation and interpretation within the greater field of consciousness, it began to fuel something which Monroe himself—in the end— quietly disowned and transcended.
Soul-trap advocates, however, went on to perform a fatal move: they treated Monroe’s early perceptual metaphor as if it were his final conclusion, then set about studiously reifying it, adding layer upon layer of imaginal detail.
But Monroe himself was not committed to Loosh in this way, as his third and final book Ultimate Journey makes plain.
Monroe and the “Loosh” Misunderstanding
The key issue is temporal fixation (the initial basic idea became frozen in time).
Monroe’s early explorations occurred while his perceptual system was still operating heavily through imaginal-symbolic translation during his OBEs. “Loosh” functioned as a placeholder metaphor—a way of narrativising perceived systemic interdependence before his abstraction faculty had stabilised.
Later Monroe material quietly de-emphasises predation in favour of an evolutionary lens, featuring:
learning systems
developmental gradients for conscious beings in the Earth Life System
self-selected participation (total autonomy and agency)
consciousness education rather than “harvesting”
Soul-trap advocates freeze Monroe at an early symbolic compression stage, then treat his metaphor as ontology, and then build an entire cosmology on a provisional linguistic scaffold which he himself outgrew.
Simply put: during his earlier OBEs, Monroe dimly sensed the importance of human emotion within the broader system of consciousness he was part of, and then framed that intuition in a quasi-mythic story form.
Leaning on the scaffolding from my Book 2 (a deep study into the afterlife), we could say Monroe translated the felt interrelationship and coherence of the larger system into lower-mind imagery and narrative—and initially interpreted it as a literal energetic economy (unnamed beings harvesting human emotions/Loosh).
Later, Soul Trap advocates then “inserted” (unconsciously projected) specific bad actors into this imaginal economy to administer it from on high.
But what if the “farm” was never truly a farm, but merely an imaginal way of pointing at energetic interrelation within a larger system before Monroe’s perceptual clarity—his abstraction faculty—had fully matured and stabilised?
What “Before Abstraction Had Stabilised” Means
Your abstraction faculty stabilises when your consciousness can, among other things:
refrain from narrativising experience as story,
refrain from projecting external agents and entities imbued with motives, control or power, and,
hold meaning without moralising or finger-pointing.
Incidentally, those three things are exactly what religious fundamentalists are notoriously bad at. (Not a coincidence.)
Early on, Monroe couldn’t yet do all those things consistently in his OBEs. Later Monroe, however, could.
This is visible in his shift:
away from his early farming metaphors
away from an implied predatory framing
toward education systems, learning loops,
crucially, toward self-selection/agency, and non-coercive participation models
In terms of the model developed in my Book 2 of THE GRAND ILLUSION:
early Monroe was operating in what I call the Astral Fantasia
later Monroe increasingly accessed higher mind or Causal framing—where illusion progressively evaporates and coherence increases
The “system” didn’t change, only his representational capacity did. Thus, by 1994, in his final book, the imaginal picture he was painting had changed radically.
Why This Gets Missed by Soul-Trap Advocates
This is all conveniently overlooked because acknowledging this would require admitting something uncomfortable:
The problem might not be the system, but the level at which it’s being perceived.
Soul-trap cosmologies rely on freezing perception at the imaginal-narrative layer where the maximum amount of noise and distortion exists, and then declaring it ultimate.
They cannot allow abstraction to supersede imagery, because abstraction dissolves villains and victimhood.
And without villains and their victims, the narrative collapses.
What begins as “revelation” dissolves as higher strata of the participatory consciousness system are accessed—where illusion becomes increasingly structurally impossible.
A Cleaner Reframe of Monroe’s Insight
Here is Monroe’s genuine contribution, stripped of narrative:
Our consciousness is not energetically isolated
Emotional intensity participates in larger system dynamics—and is distilled and harvested by us (our larger selves)
Individual experience feeds into collective fields and higher-level nestings of self
Meaning has upstream collective-systemic effects, not just personal ones
None of that implies sinister harvesting, coercion, or deception.
What it does imply is deeply rooted interdependence—which appears very differently within low-level clairvoyant perception (Astral Fantasia) operating under maximum perceptual distortion.
For centuries, esoteric teachers have warned about the deceptiveness of astral perception, but few have listened.
“Soul Trapists” today still fall into the age-old trap of thinking that what the Astral Light reveals to their imaginal perception should be taken literally.
“Loosh” was Monroe’s initial way of sensing “Something about the emotional content of lived experience matters beyond the embodied individual”, but he didn’t yet have the abstraction to say it cleanly.
And his fundamental perception (not the story about it) was right: lived experience is cherished by higher levels of selfdom—the parts of us that initiate the downward journey into physicality and the illusion of separation.
Beyond Literalism
It is no overstatement to say:
Monroe’s early “Loosh”-related language reflects an attempt to narrativise systemic energetic interdependence and perceived value-derivation before he had a stable abstract framework for non-agentic process (system-driven process, as opposed to processes initiated by anthropomorphic administrators, wardens, handlers, Anunnaki etc.).
This is what Soul Trap literalists fail to grasp.
The Deeper Pattern (and Why This Keeps Repeating)
This pattern of perception repeats everywhere and everywhen:
early mystics
early OBE explorers and psychonauts in general
early theorists of consciousness
First comes (1) contact and raw perception, then (2) metaphor—and only later comes (3) cleaner abstraction.
The tragedy is when later readers mistake metaphor for map and then freeze the process before ever reaching step 3.
Inevitably, Monroe—who was a sophisticated and intelligent man—outgrew his early language, while many of his followers and Soul Trap acolytes instead canonised it.
This is a classic example of clear-cut epistemic failure—and this broader epistemic deficit actually defines the entire realm of Soul Trap belief.
If you find the downstream effect of the resultant Soul Trap mythology appears trivial, then ask yourself this: What happens to a mind that truly believes in it, once the body is dropped?—or even just on a regular day-to-day basis?
Where Loosh Is De-literalized
Chapter 12 — “The I-There Cluster” in Robert A. Monroe—Ultimate Journey (1994).
This chapter is where Monroe reframes earlier interpretations and introduces the “I-There” / INSPEC (Intelligent Species) perspective that collapses external agency. “I-There” is another term for Oversoul, not to be confused with the Monad (all this is clarified in Book 2 in detail).
In other traditions’ terminology we might call the “I-There” the fully integrated Causal Body.
Monroe’s I-There is explicit that he and it are one and the same. Functionally, the INSPEC closely parallels what Neoplatonists and Hermeticists referred to as a Daimon.
Key moves in this chapter include:
External systems are now reframed as extensions of the total self
Value is described as intrinsic to experience
His earlier interpretations are acknowledged as limited by perceptual bandwidth
This is the structural undoing of Monroe’s initial concept of Loosh-as-extraction. Monroe does not explicitly spell it out for his readers by openly retracting previous statements here, but it is clear his perception has risen above most, if not all, of the Astral Fantasia noise and he is receiving a clearer signal.
His abstraction faculty is well and truly online and operational.
Chapter 14 — “The Sum and the Parts”, or, “INSPEC”
This is where Monroe clearly reveals that some of his earlier interpretations were misconstruals, perceived external organisation was actually just a function of limited perspective; and, finally, the larger system is fundamentally non-adversarial and non-extractive—it is benign at worst.
Why do Soul-Trap advocates miss all this?
Most soul-trap readers evidently stop at Journeys Out of the Body or Far Journeys (the height of Monroe’s Loosh reification), and thus, they never integrate the I-There/INSPEC chapters, and continue to treat early metaphors as fixed ontology.
However, Ultimate Journey is overtly evolutionary and developmental. Here Monroe simply outgrows his old percepts and the narratives around them. He becomes crystal clear that what was originally dimly perceived as “external organisation” and valuing of human emotional energy, is actually all rooted in higher strata of self.
Chapter 14 (“The Sum and the Parts”) doesn’t try to explain Loosh away because Monroe simply isn’t revisiting Loosh as a concept anymore—he’s operating from a different ontological altitude.
By Ultimate Journey, Monroe is no longer mapping imaginal energy “economies”, or framing consciousness in quasi-extractive terms.
The vague “someone, somewhere” placeholder concept from his first book is effectively replaced very lucidly with his own I-There/Oversoul. It is this latter being who is really the mysterious “someone, somewhere” creator being who so deeply values the emotional residue of earthly lived experience.
At this higher altitude, Monroe is dealing with identity integration across his Total Self—even perceiving the entire Total Self network of the whole Earth Life System.
From this meta-vantage, the imaginal Loosh concept simply falls out of relevance—because illusion is almost completely structurally impossible here.
The clarification by Monroe is structural, not explicitly verbal.
The energy “farmer” turns out to be… himself.
The Gathering—and Harvesting
Side Bar: While initially framed in such a way as to imply a group of “alien” intelligences surrounding the Earth (in Far Journeys), later imaginal adventures by Monroe suggest the “Gathering” of non-human intelligences around the Earth consists instead of many, many I-There entities (Oversouls) belonging to the Earth Life System. It is these supra-human intelligences doing the “harvesting” of earthly experience and emotion.
Monroe’s material about the “alien-sounding” Gathering in chapter 16 of Far Journeys predates his full I-There integration we see in his final book.
The latter is where he shifts to a system-level vantage beyond the usual constraints of the Bob Monroe personality structure—then it becomes apparent the “other” entities include his own Oversoul, and many others. He is then consciously connected to all of it, no longer the “discrete” observer he functions as in Far Journeys, who feels like he is witnessing something very unfamiliar and “alien”.
The subject-object split is in full force in Far Journeys.
His framing of the spectacle initially does make it sound like a convergence of “alien” entities upon the Earth to observe and witness—and if readers stop their study of Monroe there, there is a high risk of perceiving that material in such as way that it could become Soul Trap ammunition, or at least contribute to narratives about aliens who are invested in humanity’s activities on earth. (I’m not saying there are not such things, but that is not the point here.)
The alien interpretation of the Gathering is understandable, because Monroe faithfully reports guide-language describing the entities coming from “other nearby energy systems”; however, later identity integration reveals this to be a perspectival description of adjacent consciousness strata he had not yet fully integrated, not a literal visitation by external beings.
Monroe eventually clarifies in Ultimate Journey that what is “harvested” from the human experience is:
information and experiential data
love energy
coherence—within the total being, not by external entities.
The above dovetails with other esoteric traditions.
The alien-looking “Gathering” simply disappears by default as Monroe’s own identity integration process unfolds past a critical point and he realises he and his Oversoul are one—and deeply connected into the broader Oversoul Network (my term).
Later commentators, however, isolated the imaginal and guide-mediated language of Far Journeys from this early stage of the developmental arc and reified it, recasting a limited perspectival description as evidence of literal external/alien observers—thereby freezing the perception at an early interpretive altitude.
Where the de-literalisation actually happens
The de-literalisation of Loosh occurs across three primary shifts.
1. From external system → internal function
In Far Journeys, Loosh is still framed as (to paraphrase) valued by “someone, somewhere”—an unidentified creator being. It’s vague and non-specific. No overseers named and no hierarchy stabilised—later Soul Trap advocates do this busy work, but from a limited vantage point, not realising Monroe had outgrown all that by Ultimate Journey.
By Ultimate Journey, Monroe’s focus moves “upward” to:
I-There clusters (the Oversoul network)
Total Self integration
recursive identity loops
next evolutionary adventures beyond the Earth Life System
Energy is no longer something harvested, but something generated as a byproduct of differentiation of self into sub-units. Loosh stops being a reified thing and becomes an artefact of perspective—perspective rooted largely in Astral Fantasia.
2. Collapse of observer–producer separation
Earlier books rely on a narrative crutch which looks like:
humans → produce → Loosh → consumed elsewhere by an unidentified party
By Chapter 14 of Ultimate Journey, Monroe is experiencing:
simultaneous participation across levels
identity continuity between “producer” (self) and “beneficiary” (also self)
...which quietly annihilates the soul-trap premise. You cannot be farmed by a system you are ontologically identical with.
3. Shift from cosmology to phenomenology
Loosh belongs to Monroe’s early cosmological phase when his abstraction faculty hadn’t yet stabilised and experience needed story-form scaffolding to be communicated.
By Ultimate Journey—and this is crucial to grasp—he’s no longer explaining how the universe supposedly works: he’s reporting how identity coheres within a multi-tiered system.
The uncomfortable truth (for Soul Trap fans)
The reason Loosh never gets a tidy and overt clarification is because Monroe outgrew the metaphor without formally retiring it.
This created a vacuum that later readers naively filled with:
archons (a misconstrued Gnostic idea—dissected in detail in Book 2)
harvesters and wardens of various stripes
prison-planet mythology
moralised cosmology featuring “goodies vs baddies” and hidden agendas
Instead of outgrowing Monroe’s early mythic scaffolding with him, Soul Trap enthusiasts doubled down and reified it all the more—populating the imaginal landscape with ever more malevolent virtual entities.
To Summarise
Loosh first appears as a interpretive narrativisation tool for dimly perceived systemic interdependence and processual relationship (in an OBE context).
It is elaborated and reified in Far Journeys while Monroe is still mapping structure from a relatively low-level imaginal vantage point within the earthbound consciousness system. The initial “alien” framing of the Gathering exacerbates the tendency towards interpreting such structures through a predatory lens.
It is simply (and quietly) rendered obsolete in Ultimate Journey by a shift to identity integration from a much higher and cleaner system-level vantage.
It is never explicitly retracted or debunked because Monroe is no longer speaking from that frame—he has simply outgrown it and integrated a higher bandwidth of informational coherence.
Put simply: Loosh is a meme derived from early imaginal immersion which cannot survive contact with higher, more coherent tiers of the Total Self model I’m articulating in my Book 2 framework. What I’m not doing here is explaining how perception collapses into imagery, or how abstraction stabilises—that requires a much longer treatment.
I won’t name my Book 2 model or get deep into specifics here, other than to say I devote a chapter to a scholarly dissection of precisely how and why we ended up with the Soul Trap meme (something no one ever seems to explain rigorously in public), and what the subtle underlying psycho-perceptual mechanics are driving it. To my knowledge, this particular explanation has never been laid out carefully and publicly in one place, drawing simultaneously on modern data and long-standing esoteric frameworks. And unlike many public-facing Soul Trap advocates, I take care not to misrepresent the traditional sources I draw from.
About Brendan & His Other Offers
Brendan D. Murphy researches consciousness, post-mortem models, non-physical perception, and the origins of modern metaphysical narratives. His work synthesises contemporary data with classical esoteric frameworks, most notably in The Grand Illusion Book 2—a cutting-edge study into the afterlife (coming soon!). Grab your copy of the first volume “The Grand Illusion: A Synthesis of Science and Spirituality — Book 1”

📕 BOOK 2 IS COMING! Get on the wait list for the astonishing Book 2 of “The Grand Illusion”
UPGRADE YOURSELF with a “revolutionary healing science expanding the boundaries of being.” Watch the free How to Evolve Yourself (WITHOUT Hard Work or Meditation) Masterclass to learn how this transformative evolutionary biofield activation and healing work with sound can change your world. Watch the webclass to register and save your seat for the next live ceremony












THANK YOU, Brendan! I have honestly, in my own time and way, considered (contemplated, analyzed and felt my way through) the concept of the Soul Trap and ultimately rejected it. Your writing on this has helped me understand intellectually what I previously intuited. Much gratitude to you.
Great article, Brendan. I really appreciate your perspectives on this subject.
You said: "The vague “someone, somewhere” placeholder concept from his first book is effectively replaced very lucidly with his own I-There/Oversoul. It is this latter being who is really the mysterious “someone, somewhere” creator being who so deeply values the emotional residue of earthly lived experience."
I have directly experienced something of this during a bhakti yoga exercise during a 10 day retreat run by Richard Moss 20 years ago. We did many different practices, a few of which created "significant experiences" for me, but what came unbidden out of this bhakti yoga practice was a feeling of deep gratitude for a period of my (then recent) life that I experienced as very traumatic and painful. That deep appreciation of a period of my life that I remember as kind of a nightmare really surprised me. I have no name for whatever part of myself it was that manifested at that point or why that particular period came up in my experience at that time, but it was crystal clear that this higher aspect of myself deeply appreciated those experiences. When you say about Monroe's later maturation that "The energy “farmer” turns out to be… himself.", I would say that is consistent with how things felt to me at that moment on retreat.
Regarding the Soul Trap people, can you suggest why it would be that remote viewing practices in particular produce these visions of a quite technological system for a soul's forced reincarnation? I would be very interested if someone had a good explanation for how the information generation process of remote viewing relates to other more traditional spiritual methods or experiences. Clearly there are many instances where RV returns verifiable information but it's never as consistent and repeatable as if it were a televiewer into the past or the higher dimensions of reality. It is very hard to know what you can trust.
You did say "What I’m not doing here is explaining how perception collapses into imagery, or how abstraction stabilises—that requires a much longer treatment." That's a bummer, but I look forward to reading your second book to see what you have to say about it, because I think it's very relevant for putting remote viewing into context.
You said: "If you find the downstream effect of the resultant Soul Trap mythology appears trivial, then ask yourself this: What happens to a mind that truly believes in it, once the body is dropped?—or even just on a regular day-to-day basis?"
That is a very good question, I'm glad you're bringing it up. I can say that personally it is a very unpleasant thing to have in your belief structure, or even in your "this might be true" category, as it is for me, based upon the work of Farsight. I can't dismiss those good people as charlatans but neither can I explain how their insights into this matter could be correct if it's nowhere within the literature of "credible mystics" or the spiritually advanced from the past.