Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ShieldMaiden's avatar

THANK YOU, Brendan! I have honestly, in my own time and way, considered (contemplated, analyzed and felt my way through) the concept of the Soul Trap and ultimately rejected it. Your writing on this has helped me understand intellectually what I previously intuited. Much gratitude to you.

Dave Rawlence's avatar

Great article, Brendan. I really appreciate your perspectives on this subject.

You said: "The vague “someone, somewhere” placeholder concept from his first book is effectively replaced very lucidly with his own I-There/Oversoul. It is this latter being who is really the mysterious “someone, somewhere” creator being who so deeply values the emotional residue of earthly lived experience."

I have directly experienced something of this during a bhakti yoga exercise during a 10 day retreat run by Richard Moss 20 years ago. We did many different practices, a few of which created "significant experiences" for me, but what came unbidden out of this bhakti yoga practice was a feeling of deep gratitude for a period of my (then recent) life that I experienced as very traumatic and painful. That deep appreciation of a period of my life that I remember as kind of a nightmare really surprised me. I have no name for whatever part of myself it was that manifested at that point or why that particular period came up in my experience at that time, but it was crystal clear that this higher aspect of myself deeply appreciated those experiences. When you say about Monroe's later maturation that "The energy “farmer” turns out to be… himself.", I would say that is consistent with how things felt to me at that moment on retreat.

Regarding the Soul Trap people, can you suggest why it would be that remote viewing practices in particular produce these visions of a quite technological system for a soul's forced reincarnation? I would be very interested if someone had a good explanation for how the information generation process of remote viewing relates to other more traditional spiritual methods or experiences. Clearly there are many instances where RV returns verifiable information but it's never as consistent and repeatable as if it were a televiewer into the past or the higher dimensions of reality. It is very hard to know what you can trust.

You did say "What I’m not doing here is explaining how perception collapses into imagery, or how abstraction stabilises—that requires a much longer treatment." That's a bummer, but I look forward to reading your second book to see what you have to say about it, because I think it's very relevant for putting remote viewing into context.

You said: "If you find the downstream effect of the resultant Soul Trap mythology appears trivial, then ask yourself this: What happens to a mind that truly believes in it, once the body is dropped?—or even just on a regular day-to-day basis?"

That is a very good question, I'm glad you're bringing it up. I can say that personally it is a very unpleasant thing to have in your belief structure, or even in your "this might be true" category, as it is for me, based upon the work of Farsight. I can't dismiss those good people as charlatans but neither can I explain how their insights into this matter could be correct if it's nowhere within the literature of "credible mystics" or the spiritually advanced from the past.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?